Constitutional Law • LLB Entrance Notes
Preamble of the Constitution of India
A concise, updated study note on the Preamble-its text, source, objectives, legal status, amendment history and leading Supreme Court decisions including In Re: Berubari Union, Kesavananda Bharati and S.R. Bommai.
Meaning and importance of the Preamble
The Preamble is the introductory statement of the Constitution. It
records the authority from which the Constitution derives-"We, the
People of India"-describes India as a Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic, and declares the constitutional objectives of Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity.
For interpretation, the Preamble is an important guide to the purpose and philosophy of the Constitution. It is, however, not an independent source of legislative or executive power and its ideals are not separately enforceable as standalone rights.
Text of the Preamble
WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens:
JUSTICE, social, economic and political;
LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity;
and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;
IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.
Important Supreme Court cases on the Preamble
1. In Re: Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves, [1960] 3 SCR 250
The Supreme Court treated the Preamble as a key to understanding the minds of the Constitution-makers and the general purposes behind constitutional provisions. The Court also said that the Preamble was not a part of the Constitution and could not itself confer substantive power. That position on whether the Preamble forms part of the Constitution was later superseded by the majority view in Kesavananda Bharati.
2. I.C. Golak Nath v. State of Punjab, (1967) 2 SCR 762
The majority held that Parliament could not amend Fundamental Rights by using Article 368 as it then stood. This ruling triggered major constitutional amendments and was later overruled on this point in Kesavananda Bharati.
3. His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225
A 13-judge Bench held by a 7:6 majority that Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is wide but cannot be used to destroy or alter its basic structure or framework. The case also established that the Preamble is part of the Constitution and may be used in understanding its basic features.
The judgment upheld the validity of the 24th Amendment, while making clear that even the amending power under Article 368 is subject to the basic-structure limitation.
4. LIC of India v. Consumer Education & Research Centre, (1995) 5 SCC 482
The Supreme Court referred to the Preamble as an integral part of the Constitution and used its values, read with Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles, in constitutional interpretation.
5. S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, (1994) 3 SCC 1
The Court reaffirmed the constitutional importance of secularism. Secularism is treated as a basic feature of the Constitution, and the Preamble is an important expression of that constitutional commitment.