Contempt Petition in Supreme Court for Wilful Disobedience of Court Order
Updated specimen for a civil contempt petition alleging deliberate non-compliance with a binding order of the Supreme Court of India, framed around Article 129 of the Constitution, Sections 2(b) and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and Rule 3 of the Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975.
Current legal framework
Updated Supreme Court civil contempt petition format
INHERENT JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. ____ OF 20__
IN
SLP / CIVIL APPEAL / WRIT PETITION / TRANSFER PETITION / OTHER NO. ____ OF 20__
IN THE MATTER OF:
Name of Petitioner/Applicant
Address: ________________________________
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
Name and designation of alleged contemnor
Address: ________________________________
...ALLEGED CONTEMNOR/RESPONDENT
CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 129 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTIONS 2(b) AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 AND RULE 3 OF THE RULES TO REGULATE PROCEEDINGS FOR CONTEMPT OF THE SUPREME COURT, 1975
TO
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA
AND HIS/HER COMPANION JUSTICES OF
THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
THE HUMBLE PETITION OF THE PETITIONER ABOVE NAMED
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
SYNOPSIS
The present petition concerns wilful non-compliance with the order dated ____________ passed by this Hon'ble Court in case title and number. The operative direction required the alleged contemnor to quote or accurately summarise the precise direction within/by time/event.
Despite knowledge/service of the order and despite communications, reminders, hearings or opportunities to comply, the alleged contemnor has failed/refused to comply in the following manner: concise description. The Petitioner submits that the breach is deliberate and wilful for the reasons stated below.
LIST OF DATES AND EVENTS
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| __/__/20__ | Original proceedings instituted. |
| __/__/20__ | Supreme Court passed the operative order/judgment. |
| __/__/20__ | Order communicated/served or alleged contemnor otherwise acquired knowledge. |
| __/__/20__ | Time for compliance expired / obligation became due. |
| __/__/20__ | Reminder/representation seeking compliance. |
| __/__/20__ | Response/refusal/partial compliance, if any. |
| __/__/20__ | Present contempt petition filed. |
FACTS
1. The Petitioner was petitioner/respondent/applicant in the above-mentioned original proceedings and is directly affected by non-compliance with the order dated ____________.
2. This Hon'ble Court, by order/judgment dated ____________, directed as follows: set out only the material operative direction accurately. A true copy is annexed as ANNEXURE P-1.
3. The alleged contemnor had knowledge of the order because present in Court / represented by counsel / formally served / received communication / acted upon part of the order. Supporting material is annexed as ANNEXURE P-2.
4. The order required compliance by/on ____________. The alleged contemnor had the authority and practical ability to comply because state facts showing control, responsibility and capacity.
5. Nevertheless, the alleged contemnor failed to comply by identify precise omission or contrary act.
6. On ____________, the Petitioner requested compliance by letter/email/representation. A copy is annexed as ANNEXURE P-3. The alleged contemnor failed to respond / refused / gave response dated ___.
7. The non-compliance is wilful and deliberate because state specific facts: repeated opportunities, explicit refusal, contradictory action, selective compliance, admitted knowledge, absence of legal impediment, etc..
8. The Petitioner is not seeking adjudication of a new substantive dispute or modification of the original order. The relief sought is confined to securing obedience to the existing direction and such consequential action as this Hon'ble Court considers lawful in contempt jurisdiction.
9. Limitation. The contempt complained of occurred on ____________ when describe the alleged breach. The present proceedings are within the period prescribed by Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. If reliance is placed on later/repeated acts, each material date and its legal relevance should be specifically pleaded.
GROUNDS
- The operative direction dated ____________ is clear, unambiguous and binding on the alleged contemnor.
- The alleged contemnor had actual/constructive knowledge of the order before the obligation to comply arose.
- The alleged contemnor possessed the authority and ability to comply with the direction.
- The breach is not accidental, technical or caused by impossibility; it is deliberate and wilful for the reasons pleaded in paragraphs ____.
- Repeated requests/opportunities for compliance were disregarded without sufficient legal justification.
- The acts/omissions complained of directly defeat the command of this Hon'ble Court and therefore attract the definition of civil contempt under Section 2(b), subject to this Hon'ble Court's satisfaction.
PRAYER
In these circumstances, the Petitioner respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:
a. issue notice to the alleged contemnor in accordance with the Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975;
b. initiate appropriate contempt proceedings for the alleged wilful disobedience of the order dated ____________;
c. direct compliance with the operative directions of this Hon'ble Court within such period and subject to such safeguards as this Hon'ble Court considers appropriate;
d. upon being satisfied that contempt is established, pass such order under Article 129 and the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 as is warranted by law; and
e. pass any other or further order deemed just and proper.
FILED BY
ADVOCATE-ON-RECORD
Drawn by: ____________
Place: New Delhi
Date: ____________
AFFIDAVIT
I, name, aged about ____ years, S/o / D/o / W/o ____________, resident of ________________________________, solemnly affirm:
1. I am the Petitioner/deponent in the accompanying contempt petition and am competent to swear this affidavit.
2. The statements in paragraphs ____ to ____ are true to my personal knowledge; statements derived from records are based on records believed to be true; and legal submissions are based on advice received and believed to be correct.
3. The annexures filed with the petition are true copies of their respective originals/records.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified at ____________ on this ____ day of ____________, 20__, that the contents above are true and correct to my knowledge and belief and nothing material has been concealed.
DEPONENT
Section 12: punishment and apology
Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 provides the statutory punishment framework for contempt. It also recognises that an accused may be discharged, or punishment remitted, on an apology made to the satisfaction of the Court; a bona fide apology is not to be rejected merely because it is qualified or conditional. In civil contempt, where the Court considers a fine inadequate and imprisonment necessary, subsection (3) provides for detention in civil prison for a period not exceeding six months.
Subsections (4) and (5) contain special provisions for contempt connected with an undertaking by a company, including circumstances in which persons responsible for the company's business, or officers whose consent, connivance or neglect is proved, may be dealt with. A petition involving a company should identify the precise undertaking/order and factual basis for proceeding against each individual officer rather than naming officers merely by designation.
Supreme Court contempt procedure
Under Rule 3 of the 1975 Rules, proceedings outside the Court's presence may originate suo motu, on a petition by the Attorney General or Solicitor General, or on a petition by another person. Where the allegation is criminal contempt and a private person proceeds under Rule 3(c), written consent of the Attorney General or Solicitor General is required. That consent requirement should not be incorrectly imported into an ordinary civil-contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience under Section 2(b).
A petition under Rule 3(b) or 3(c) is subject to the requirements of Rule 4, including affidavit support and filing of documents relied upon. Rule 5 provides for preliminary hearing; if no prima facie case exists the petition may be dismissed, otherwise notice may issue. Rule 6 deals with notice and appearance, Rule 7 permits the person charged to file a reply supported by affidavit, and Rule 8 requires leave for further affidavits or documents.
Filing checklist
- Use the exact originating Supreme Court case number and current contempt-petition cause title.
- Annex the order/judgment said to have been disobeyed and identify its precise operative direction.
- Plead how and when the alleged contemnor acquired knowledge of the order.
- Plead the compliance deadline, the contemnor's ability to comply and facts demonstrating wilfulness.
- Explain any partial compliance and why it does not satisfy the order.
- Check Section 20 limitation before filing and plead the relevant contempt date accurately.
- Support the petition by affidavit and attach only material documents relied upon.
- Distinguish civil contempt from criminal contempt; obtain Attorney General/Solicitor General consent where legally required for private criminal-contempt proceedings.
- Comply with current Supreme Court Registry, Advocate-on-Record and e-filing requirements.
Official resources
- Supreme Court JurisdictionOfficial explanation of the Court's contempt jurisdiction under Articles 129 and 142 and Rule 3 of the 1975 Rules.
- Supreme Court RulesOfficial Rules page, including the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and subsequent amendments.
- Supreme Court e-FilingOfficial electronic filing facility and filing information.
- India CodeOfficial central legislation database. Search for the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act 70 of 1971).
- Constitution of IndiaOfficial Legislative Department resource; see Article 129.
- Supreme Court Interlocutory ApplicationsOfficial listing of application categories, including contempt-related filings.
This specimen is for alleged disobedience of an order of the Supreme Court itself. Contempt concerning an order of a High Court or subordinate court follows the jurisdiction and procedure applicable to that court and should not be adapted mechanically from this format.