Family Law | Mediation | Settlement Drafting

Delhi High Court Guidelines for Drafting Matrimonial Settlement Agreements

A practical, updated guide to the Delhi High Court's directions in Sh. Chhatter Pal & Ors. v. State & Anr., CRL.M.C. 6197/2019, for drafting clear mediated settlements in matrimonial disputes, together with current criminal-law references and the Delhi High Court's 2026 practice directions for FIR-quashing cases based on settlement.

Case
Sh. Chhatter Pal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
Case number
CRL.M.C. 6197/2019
Court
High Court of Delhi
Subject
Drafting of mediated settlement agreements in matrimonial disputes
2026 update: Delhi High Court Practice Direction No. 187/Rules/DHC dated 9 July 2026 requires parties seeking quashing of an FIR on the basis of settlement terms, an MoU, a settlement deed or similar arrangement to file their respective affidavits in accordance with the Court's specified 2026 practice directions.

Why precise settlement drafting matters

Matrimonial settlements often resolve several connected proceedings at the same time: divorce, maintenance, custody, domestic-violence proceedings, return of stridhan, criminal complaints and FIRs. The Delhi High Court emphasized that inadequate drafting, omissions, inconsistent terms and unclear performance obligations can create fresh litigation even after successful mediation.

The drafting objective is therefore straightforward: identify every person and proceeding, record exactly what each side has agreed to do, specify when and how it will be done, and state the consequence of non-compliance.

Delhi High Court guidelines for mediated matrimonial settlements

  1. Specify the names of all parties. The settlement should identify every person who is intended to be bound by or benefit from the agreement. Do not leave identity to be inferred from the title of a case or FIR.
  2. Avoid ambiguous labels. Expressions such as "petitioner", "respondent" or "respondents" should not be used without clearly connecting them to the names of the persons concerned. Names should be repeated wherever necessary to prevent ambiguity.
  3. Record every agreed term. All terms and conditions, including apparently minor details, should be written into the settlement. Matters left to oral understanding can become the source of subsequent disputes.
  4. Give definite timelines. State the dates or objectively ascertainable stages for payment, appearance, withdrawal, filing, return of articles and other obligations. Avoid tentative dates wherever possible.
  5. Include a default clause. The agreement should state what happens if a party does not comply with an agreed obligation, while keeping the clause consistent with law and the jurisdiction of the court or authority concerned.
  6. Specify the mode of payment. Record whether payment will be made electronically, by demand draft, fixed-deposit instrument or another agreed lawful method, along with the details needed to establish performance and receipt.
  7. Identify follow-up documents. State which petitions, affidavits, applications, undertakings, receipts, no-objection statements or other documents must be prepared and signed; who will prepare them; the stage at which they will be filed; and, where relevant, who bears the cost.
  8. Be specific where FIR quashing is part of the settlement. If the settlement contemplates quashing of a matrimonial FIR, list by name all persons whose criminal proceedings are intended to be covered. Clearly state whether the entire FIR and consequential proceedings are intended to be quashed against all such persons.
  9. List criminal complaints and cross-cases separately. Mention the FIR/complaint number, police station, statutory provisions, parties, court or investigating authority, present stage and the precise step proposed for disposal, withdrawal or quashing.
  10. Confirm that the parties read and understood the settlement. The document should record that its contents have been understood by the parties, including in their vernacular language where necessary.
  11. Clarify signatures and representation. Where some family members or parties are absent from mediation, the settlement must not casually imply that an attendee has authority to bind them. Any representation or authority relied upon should be expressly stated and legally supportable.
  12. Use definite, intelligible language. Draft terms that reveal the actual intention of the parties and the result they intend to achieve. Avoid vague expressions that require a later court to reconstruct the bargain.

Settlement agreements in Hindi

The judgment further directed mediation centres to ensure, as far as possible, that mediated settlement agreements are prepared in Hindi in addition to English where the parties may not adequately comprehend English. Where the parties are well-versed in English and expressly want the settlement only in English, the judgment did not insist on a Hindi version.

A bilingual settlement should be checked carefully so that payment amounts, dates, case numbers, names, obligations and default consequences are identical in both versions. If one version is intended to prevail in the event of inconsistency, that should be stated expressly.

Current criminal-law references after 1 July 2024

The judgment and older matrimonial settlements may refer to Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 because those were the provisions applicable when such cases arose. For offences and proceedings governed by the post-1 July 2024 framework, the corresponding current provisions include Sections 85 and 86 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for cruelty by the husband or his relative, and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for the High Court's inherent powers. Section 531 BNSS contains repeal and savings provisions, so the governing provision in an older or pending matter must be checked rather than mechanically replacing every historical citation.

Delhi High Court 2026 practice direction for quashing based on settlement

Practice Direction No. 187/Rules/DHC dated 9 July 2026 applies where parties seek quashing of an FIR on the basis of settlement terms, a memorandum of understanding, settlement deed or similar document. It requires the parties to file their respective affidavits in terms of Practice Direction No. 178/Rules/DHC dated 18 March 2026, as modified by Practice Direction No. 183/Rules/DHC dated 26 May 2026.

A settlement clause saying that an FIR "stands withdrawn" or "automatically stands quashed" should be avoided. Where quashing requires an order of the High Court, the agreement should instead record the parties' obligation to cooperate, file the required petition/affidavits, appear where directed, and make the agreed statements before the Court.

Practical matrimonial settlement checklist

IssueWhat the settlement should specify
PartiesFull names, relationship to spouses and precise persons covered by each term.
DivorceStatutory route, filing stage, first/second motion where applicable, dates and cooperation obligations.
Settlement amountTotal amount, instalments, due dates, mode of payment, tax implications if relevant and acknowledgement of receipt.
Maintenance/alimonyPast, present and future claims actually being settled, subject to rights that law does not permit parties to waive.
Stridhan/articlesItemised list, condition, place/date of return and acknowledgement.
ChildrenCustody, visitation/access, education, maintenance, travel/passport arrangements and a child-welfare compliant mechanism for future issues.
FIR/criminal caseFIR number, police station, sections, accused/persons covered, court details and steps for lawful quashing or disposal.
Other casesCase/complaint numbers, forum, parties, current status and exact withdrawal/disposal obligation.
DocumentsPetitions, affidavits, applications, receipts, consent statements and timelines for signing/filing.
DefaultLawful consequences of breach, restoration/enforcement mechanism where appropriate and treatment of payments already made.

Illustrative FIR-quashing clause

Example: The parties agree that, after performance of the settlement obligations due up to that stage, the persons specifically named in the agreement shall cooperate in filing and prosecuting the appropriate petition before the High Court for quashing of the identified FIR and consequential proceedings. Each concerned party shall file the affidavit(s), appear before the Court when required and make truthful statements in accordance with the applicable practice directions. Final quashing remains subject to the order of the competent Court.

Official resources

The checklist above is a drafting aid. A settlement must be adapted to the parties, the exact proceedings, the applicable substantive law and any directions of the court or mediation centre handling the matter.