AAP Tax Law

IPC Sections 465 to 489E: Forgery, Documents, Property Marks and Currency Notes

Chapter XVIII of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 dealt with offences relating to documents and property marks. The provisions covered forgery and forged documents, falsification of accounts, false and counterfeit property marks, and forged or counterfeit currency-notes and bank-notes. This article explains the principal definitions and the Sections 465 to 489E offences covered by this page under the law applicable immediately before the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 came into force.

Pre-BNS legal position: The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 came into force on 1 July 2024, except the notified provision of Section 106(2). This page states the central IPC and CrPC position immediately before 1 July 2024. The date of the alleged offence, saving provisions and applicable State amendments should be checked in an individual case.

Key legal definitions

Document and electronic record

For IPC purposes, the definition of "document" was contained in Section 29. Following amendments associated with electronic records, the forgery provisions also expressly dealt with documents and electronic records. The exact statutory ingredients remain important because forgery is not established merely because information is false.

Section 463 - Forgery

Section 463 defined forgery by reference to making a false document or false electronic record, or part of one, with one of the specified fraudulent or injurious intents, including intent to cause damage or injury, support a claim or title, cause a person to part with property, enter into an express or implied contract, or commit fraud or facilitate fraud.

Section 464 - Making a false document or false electronic record

Section 464 set out when a person makes a false document or false electronic record. Broadly, it covered dishonestly or fraudulently making, signing, sealing, executing or transmitting a document or electronic record so that it purports to have been made by another person or under authority not given; material alteration without lawful authority; and specified cases of procuring execution or alteration from a person who does not understand the nature or contents because of deception or incapacity.

Section 470 - Forged document or electronic record

Section 470 treated a false document or electronic record made wholly or partly by forgery as a forged document or electronic record.

Section 481 - Using a false property mark

Section 481 defined use of a false property mark. The following Sections 482 to 489 prescribed punishment for use, counterfeiting and misuse of property marks and related false marks.

Forgery and forged documents - Sections 465 to 477A

Section 465 contained the general punishment for forgery. More serious forms attracted enhanced punishment: Section 466 dealt with specified court and public records; Section 467 with valuable securities, wills and specified authorities; Section 468 with forgery for cheating; and Section 469 with forgery intended to harm reputation.

Section 471 addressed fraudulent or dishonest use as genuine of a forged document or electronic record where the accused knew or had reason to believe it was forged. Sections 472 to 476 addressed counterfeit seals, plates, devices and marks associated with forgery. Section 477 protected wills, authorities to adopt and valuable securities from fraudulent cancellation, destruction, defacement or concealment, while Section 477A dealt with falsification of accounts by a clerk, officer or servant.

Property marks - Sections 482 to 489

Sections 482 to 489 dealt with false property marks, counterfeiting marks used by another or by public servants, instruments for counterfeiting property marks, sale of goods bearing counterfeit marks, false marks on packages or receptacles, use of those marks and removal or destruction of property marks with intent to cause injury.

Forged and counterfeit currency-notes and bank-notes - Sections 489A to 489E

Section 489A punished counterfeiting currency-notes or bank-notes. Section 489B applied to selling, buying, receiving, trafficking in or using forged or counterfeit currency-notes or bank-notes as genuine with the required knowledge or reason to believe. Section 489C addressed possession accompanied by the statutory knowledge and intent regarding genuine use.

Section 489D covered making, buying, selling, disposing of or possessing machinery, instruments or materials for forging or counterfeiting currency-notes or bank-notes with the required purpose or knowledge. Section 489E dealt separately with making or using documents resembling currency-notes or bank-notes.

IPC Sections 465 to 489E: punishment, bail and classification

The table below states the central-law position under the IPC and the First Schedule to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 immediately before 1 July 2024. Where a section adopts the punishment or procedural character of an underlying forgery, the precise classification depends on the forged document involved. State amendments should be checked separately.

IPC SectionOffencePunishmentCognizableBailTrial court
465ForgeryUp to 2 years, or fine, or bothNon-cognizableBailableMagistrate of first class
466Forgery of court/public register or specified public recordUp to 7 years and fineNon-cognizableNon-bailableMagistrate of first class
467Forgery of valuable security, will, authority to receive money, etc.Life, or up to 10 years, and fineNon-cognizable*Non-bailableMagistrate of first class
468Forgery for purpose of cheatingUp to 7 years and fineCognizableNon-bailableMagistrate of first class
469Forgery for purpose of harming reputationUp to 3 years and fineCognizableBailableMagistrate of first class
471Using as genuine a forged document or electronic recordPunished in same manner as forgery of that document/electronic recordDepends on underlying forgeryDepends on underlying forgeryDepends on underlying forgery
472Making/possessing counterfeit seal, plate or instrument for Section 467 forgeryLife, or up to 7 years, and fineCognizableNon-bailableMagistrate of first class
473Making/possessing counterfeit seal, plate or instrument for other forgeryUp to 7 years and fineCognizableNon-bailableMagistrate of first class
474Possession of forged document/electronic record described in Section 466 or 467, intending genuine useSection 466 type: up to 7 years and fine; Section 467 type: life or up to 7 years and fineClassification varies by statutory entryNon-bailableMagistrate of first class
475Counterfeiting device/mark used to authenticate Section 467 documents, or possessing counterfeit marked materialLife, or up to 7 years, and fineNon-cognizableNon-bailableMagistrate of first class
476Counterfeiting device/mark used to authenticate other documents, or possessing counterfeit marked materialUp to 7 years and fineNon-cognizableNon-bailableMagistrate of first class
477Fraudulently cancelling, destroying, defacing or secreting will, authority to adopt or valuable securityLife, or up to 7 years, and fineNon-cognizableNon-bailableMagistrate of first class
477AFalsification of accounts by clerk, officer or servantUp to 7 years, or fine, or bothNon-cognizableBailableMagistrate of first class
482Using a false property markUp to 1 year, or fine, or bothNon-cognizableBailableAny Magistrate
483Counterfeiting property mark used by anotherUp to 2 years, or fine, or bothNon-cognizableBailableAny Magistrate
484Counterfeiting mark used by public servantUp to 3 years and fineNon-cognizableBailableMagistrate of first class
485Making/possessing instrument for counterfeiting property markUp to 3 years, or fine, or bothNon-cognizableBailableMagistrate of first class
486Selling goods marked with counterfeit property markUp to 1 year, or fine, or bothNon-cognizableBailableAny Magistrate
487Making false mark on receptacle containing goodsUp to 3 years, or fine, or bothNon-cognizableBailableAny Magistrate
488Using such false markUp to 3 years, or fine, or bothNon-cognizableBailableAny Magistrate
489Tampering with property mark with intent to cause injuryUp to 1 year, or fine, or bothNon-cognizableBailableAny Magistrate
489ACounterfeiting currency-notes or bank-notesLife, or up to 10 years, and fineCognizableNon-bailableCourt of Session
489BUsing as genuine or trafficking in forged/counterfeit currency-notes or bank-notesLife, or up to 10 years, and fineCognizableNon-bailableCourt of Session
489CPossession of forged/counterfeit currency-notes or bank-notes with required knowledge and intentUp to 7 years, or fine, or bothCognizableBailableCourt of Session
489DMaking or possessing instruments/materials for forging or counterfeiting currency-notes or bank-notesLife, or up to 10 years, and fineCognizableNon-bailableCourt of Session
489EMaking or using documents resembling currency-notes or bank-notesFine up to Rs. 100; refusal to disclose printer: fine up to Rs. 200Non-cognizableBailableAny Magistrate

* Section 467 has a distinct First Schedule entry where the valuable security is a promissory note of the Central Government; the special entry should be checked where relevant.

Important points when applying forgery provisions

A false statement and a false document are not necessarily the same thing. The statutory requirements of Sections 463 and 464 must be examined to determine whether the alleged act amounts to making a false document or electronic record and therefore to forgery.

Section 471 depends on the nature of the forged instrument. Its punishment follows the punishment that would apply if the accused had forged that document or electronic record. The underlying type of forgery therefore affects punishment and procedural classification.

Counterfeit currency offences require attention to knowledge and intent. Sections 489B and 489C expressly contain mental elements concerning knowledge or reason to believe that the currency-note or bank-note is forged or counterfeit, and Section 489C additionally addresses intended genuine use.

Legal reference: This is a general guide to the central IPC and CrPC position immediately before 1 July 2024. For a specific case, the full statutory text, amendments, applicable State law and binding judicial decisions should be examined.