IPC Sections 470, 471, 472, 473 and 474: Forged Documents, Use as Genuine, Counterfeit Seals and Possession

Sections 470 to 474 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 dealt with forged documents or electronic records, their fraudulent or dishonest use, counterfeit seals or instruments intended for forgery, and possession of specified forged documents with intent to use them as genuine.

Legal period covered: This article explains the Indian Penal Code position applicable immediately before the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 came into force on 1 July 2024. It is intended for understanding the pre-BNS law and matters to which the former IPC continues to be relevant.
SectionSubjectMaximum punishment under IPC
470Definition of forged document or electronic recordDefinition provision
471Using as genuine a forged document or electronic recordSame manner as if the person had forged it
472Counterfeit seal or instrument intended for forgery punishable under Section 467Life imprisonment, or imprisonment up to 7 years, and fine
473Counterfeit seal or instrument intended for other forgery under the ChapterImprisonment up to 7 years and fine
474Possession of forged document or electronic record described in Section 466 or 467 with requisite knowledge and intentSection 466 description: up to 7 years and fine; Section 467 description: life imprisonment or up to 7 years and fine

Section 470 IPC - Forged document or electronic record

A false document or electronic record made wholly or in part by forgery is designated a forged document or electronic record.

Section 470 therefore operated as a definition provision. Whether a document was forged depended on the law of forgery and false documents in the preceding IPC provisions, particularly Sections 463 and 464.

The words relating to an electronic record were incorporated through the Information Technology Act, 2000 amendments.

Section 471 IPC - Using as genuine a forged document

Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine a document or electronic record which the person knows, or has reason to believe, to be forged is punishable in the same manner as if that person had forged the document or electronic record.

Essential ingredients of Section 471

The prosecution must address the existence of a forged document or electronic record, its use as genuine, fraudulent or dishonest use, and the accused person's knowledge or reason to believe that it was forged. The punishment is linked to the nature of the underlying forgery rather than prescribing one uniform term for every case under Section 471.

Section 472 IPC - Counterfeit seal or instrument for forgery punishable under Section 467

A person who makes or counterfeits a seal, plate or other instrument for making an impression, intending it to be used to commit a forgery punishable under Section 467, or possesses such counterfeit instrument with that intent and knowledge of its counterfeit nature, is punishable with imprisonment for life or imprisonment of either description up to seven years, and is also liable to fine.

Section 472 concerned instruments intended for the particularly serious class of forgery covered by Section 467, including forgery of valuable security, wills and specified documents.

Section 473 IPC - Counterfeit seal or instrument for other forgery

Where a counterfeit seal, plate or other instrument for making an impression is made or possessed with the prescribed intent for committing a forgery punishable under a provision of the same Chapter other than Section 467, the punishment may extend to seven years' imprisonment of either description, and fine.

The principal distinction between Sections 472 and 473 was the intended forgery. Section 472 specifically concerned forgery punishable under Section 467, while Section 473 applied to forgery punishable under another section of the Chapter.

Section 474 IPC - Possession of forged documents described in Section 466 or 467

Section 474 applied where a person possessed a document or electronic record knowing it to be forged and intended that it be fraudulently or dishonestly used as genuine. If it was of a description mentioned in Section 466, punishment could extend to seven years and fine. If it was of a description mentioned in Section 467, punishment was imprisonment for life or imprisonment of either description up to seven years, and fine.

Knowledge and intention under Section 474

Mere physical possession was not the complete statutory test. The provision expressly required knowledge that the document or electronic record was forged together with the intention that it be fraudulently or dishonestly used as genuine.

Relationship between Sections 470 to 474

These provisions addressed different stages and forms of document-related forgery. Section 470 defined the forged document or electronic record. Section 471 dealt with fraudulent or dishonest use as genuine. Sections 472 and 473 dealt with making or possessing counterfeit seals, plates or other instruments for intended forgery. Section 474 dealt with knowing possession of the specified forged documents or electronic records coupled with an intention to use them as genuine.

Pre-BNS legal context

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 replaced the Indian Penal Code as the principal central penal statute from 1 July 2024, subject to its commencement notification and savings applicable to earlier conduct and proceedings. This page deliberately explains Sections 470 to 474 IPC as they stood immediately before that transition.