AAP Tax Law - Indian legal and tax information

Section 252 IPC: Possession of Coin Known to Be Altered When Possession Began

Section 252 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 punished fraudulent possession of a coin affected by an offence under Section 246 or Section 248 where the possessor knew of that alteration at the time of becoming possessed of the coin.

Pre-BNS legal context: This article explains Section 252 IPC under the law applicable immediately before implementation of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The IPC was repealed when the BNS came into force on 1 July 2024, subject to the applicable repeal-and-savings provisions for earlier conduct and proceedings.

Section 252 IPC - Statutory Provision

Possession of coin by person who knew it to be altered when he became possessed thereof.

Whoever fraudulently or with intent that fraud may be committed, is in possession of coin with respect to which the offence defined in either of the sections 246 or 248 has been committed, having known at the time of becoming possessed thereof that such offence had been committed with respect to such coin, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.

Meaning of Section 252 IPC

Section 252 was a possession offence involving an altered coin, but mere possession was not enough. The provision required the coin to have been altered in a manner constituting an offence under Section 246 or Section 248, knowledge of that fact when possession began, and possession that was fraudulent or accompanied by an intent that fraud may be committed.

Essential Ingredients

Punishment and Classification Before BNS

OffenceFraudulent possession of coin altered under Section 246 or Section 248, with knowledge of the alteration when possession began
PunishmentImprisonment of either description for a term up to 3 years and fine
CognizableYes
BailNon-bailable
Triable byMagistrate of the first class
CompoundableNo

Knowledge When Possession Began

The timing of knowledge was an express statutory requirement. The person must have known, when becoming possessed of the coin, that an offence under Section 246 or Section 248 had already been committed with respect to it. The section therefore did not state merely a general requirement of knowledge at some later point.

Meaning of Fraudulently

Section 25 IPC provided that a person does a thing "fraudulently" if the person does that thing with intent to defraud, but not otherwise. Section 252 additionally covered possession with intent that fraud may be committed.

Section 246 Referred to in Section 252

Section 246 punished fraudulently or dishonestly performing on any coin an operation that diminished its weight or altered its composition. A coin affected by that offence could therefore fall within Section 252 when the possession, knowledge and fraud requirements of Section 252 were also established.

Section 248 Referred to in Section 252

Section 248 punished performing on any coin an operation altering its appearance with the intention that the coin should pass as a coin of a different description. Such a coin could come within Section 252 where the possessor had the required knowledge from the beginning of possession and possessed it fraudulently or with intent that fraud may be committed.

Section 250 and Section 252 IPC - Difference

Section 250 concerned delivery of an altered coin to another person, or an attempt to induce another person to receive it, with the required knowledge and fraudulent intent. Section 252 instead criminalised the specified fraudulent possession itself. Section 250 carried imprisonment up to five years, while Section 252 carried imprisonment up to three years; both also provided for fine.

Section 252 and Section 253 IPC - Difference

Section 252 was the general possession provision linked to coin altered under Sections 246 or 248. Section 253 was the corresponding aggravated provision concerning Indian coin affected by an offence under Section 247 or Section 249. Under the pre-BNS law, Section 253 carried the higher maximum term of five years plus fine.

Section 252 and Section 254 IPC - Difference

Section 252 expressly required knowledge of the alteration when possession began. Section 254 dealt with delivery of altered coin in a different factual situation where the deliverer did not know, when first taking possession, that the relevant operation had been performed. The timing of knowledge was therefore central to distinguishing the provisions.

Related IPC Provisions

Section 252 formed part of Chapter XII of the IPC concerning offences relating to coin and Government stamps. Sections 246 to 249 dealt with specified forms of alteration of coin, while Sections 250 to 254 dealt with delivery and possession of altered coin under different knowledge and intent requirements.

Official Legal Sources

For authoritative statutory text and the procedural classification applicable immediately before BNS implementation, consult the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the First Schedule to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 through India Code.

India Code - Central Acts