Home / Income-tax Act 2025 / Section 445

Section 445 Income Tax Act 2025: When Can a Non-Profit Organisation Face a 100% or 200% Penalty?

Section 445 deals with the penalty for a registered non-profit organisation applying income directly or indirectly for the benefit of related persons. It distinguishes a first violation from a repeated violation in a subsequent tax year.

Current legal position: Section 445 is operative under the Income-tax Act, 2025, effective from 1 April 2026. Read it together with section 337 (specified income) and section 355(h) (related persons). This guide reflects the official consolidated Act as amended by the Finance Act, 2026.

What does Section 445 provide?

The provision applies where, during proceedings under the Act, the Assessing Officer finds that a registered non-profit organisation has specified income chargeable to tax under section 337, Table Sl. No. 2, because income has been applied directly or indirectly for the benefit of a related person described in section 355(h).

Section 445 - Benefits to related persons (accurate summary)

For the first violation noticed during any tax year, the Assessing Officer may impose a penalty equal to the aggregate amount of income so applied. Where the violation is noticed again in any subsequent tax year, the penalty may equal 200% of the aggregate amount so applied.

This is an explanatory paraphrase. Consult the official enacted text for exact statutory wording.

Relevant statutory definitions and cross-references

Registered non-profit organisation: The category of organisation governed by the registration and taxation framework for non-profit organisations under the Act. Registration status and the relevant statutory conditions must be checked for the tax year concerned.
Specified income: For section 445, the relevant income is the amount chargeable under section 337 (Table: Sl. No. 2). This cross-reference determines the category of income to which the penalty relates.
Related person: A person falling within the categories described in section 355(h). The exact statutory relationship must be established; a person is not covered merely because they have some connection with the organisation.
Direct or indirect benefit: The section covers application of income for a related person's benefit whether the benefit is conferred directly or through an intermediary or arrangement. The actual facts and statutory requirements determine whether a violation exists.
Tax year: The relevant statutory period for determining whether a violation is first noticed or is noticed again in a subsequent tax year.

How is the penalty calculated?

SituationPotential penalty under section 445
First violation noticed in a tax year100% of the aggregate income applied for the related person's benefit
Violation noticed again in a subsequent tax year200% of the aggregate income applied for the related person's benefit

The provision uses the expression may impose. A penalty is not to be treated as automatically levied merely because an accounting entry is questioned. The statutory facts and applicable procedure must be established.

Practical examples

Example 1: First violation

Assume a registered non-profit organisation applies Rs. 4,00,000 of its income for a benefit covered by section 355(h), and the violation is noticed for the first time. If section 445 applies, the potential penalty is Rs. 4,00,000 (100% of the relevant amount).

Example 2: Violation in a later tax year

Assume a violation was noticed in an earlier tax year and a further covered violation involving Rs. 3,00,000 is noticed in a subsequent tax year. If the statutory requirements are satisfied, the potential penalty is Rs. 6,00,000 (200% of Rs. 3,00,000).

These are simplified illustrations, not conclusions that any particular payment or transaction necessarily constitutes specified income.

Who can impose the penalty and what safeguards apply?

Section 445 authorises the Assessing Officer to impose the penalty. Section 471 sets out procedural safeguards for penalty orders under Chapter XXI, including an opportunity of being heard. A notice should identify the alleged benefit, the related-person relationship, the amount and whether the allegation concerns a first or subsequent violation.

The organisation should review the evidence of application of income, the recipient's relationship under section 355(h), the tax year and any earlier findings before responding. Section 470 contains a reasonable-cause rule for specifically listed penalties; section 445 is not included in that list, so a blanket reasonable-cause exemption should not be assumed.

How does Section 445 relate to the Income-tax Act, 1961?

Section 445 broadly carries forward the subject addressed by section 271AAE of the Income-tax Act, 1961. For earlier tax periods, the applicable law and transitional provisions should be examined separately.

Frequently asked questions

Does Section 445 apply to every charitable payment?

No. The statutory conditions require a registered non-profit organisation, specified income of the relevant kind and a benefit to a related person within section 355(h).

Is the penalty 100% or 200%?

It is equal to the relevant amount for a first violation and 200% of the relevant amount when a violation is noticed again in a subsequent tax year.

Is the penalty calculated on the organisation's entire income?

No. Section 445 measures the penalty by the aggregate amount of income applied directly or indirectly for the covered related-person benefit, rather than automatically by all income of the organisation.

Can the organisation respond before a penalty order is made?

Yes. Section 471 requires an opportunity of being heard before a penalty order is made.

Which provisions should be read together?

Sections 337, 355(h), 445 and 471 are especially relevant. The complete facts and other applicable provisions may also matter.

Official legal reference

Read the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026, particularly sections 337, 355, 445 and 471.

Editorial note: This article provides general legal information and does not replace examination of the statute, current rules, official notices or the facts of a particular case.

Last updated: 12 November 2026