Home / Income Tax Act 2025 / Section 249

Section 249 Income Tax Act 2025: Can Taxpayers Demand Search Reasons?

Section 249, titled Reasons not to be disclosed, protects the recorded reasons underlying certain income-tax search, seizure and requisition actions from disclosure. This article explains its scope, the related statutory powers and the practical implications for taxpayers.

Current law: The Income-tax Act, 2025 came into force on 1 April 2026. Section 249 must be read with Sections 247 and 248. The discussion below follows the official Act as amended by the Finance Act, 2026.

What does Section 249 say?

The provision states:

The reason to believe or reason to suspect, as referred to in section 247 or 248, recorded by the income-tax authority shall not be disclosed to any person or authority or the Appellate Tribunal.

Section 249 is a single provision; it does not contain separate numbered sub-sections.

What is the effect of the non-disclosure rule?

The statutory restriction concerns the recorded reason to believe or reason to suspect referred to in the search and seizure provisions of Section 247 and the requisition provisions of Section 248. The language expressly includes disclosure to a person, an authority and the Appellate Tribunal.

It is important to distinguish these recorded reasons from every other document or procedural issue that might arise during a search. Section 249 does not itself set out a complete code governing access to all search records, nor does it independently authorise a search or requisition. The legal authority for those actions must be found in Sections 247 and 248 respectively.

Relevant statutory expressions

Reason to believe: A statutory threshold used in Sections 247 and 248 for the relevant authority to act on information in its possession. Its application depends on the specific conditions in those provisions; it is not simply an unrestricted discretion.

Reason to suspect: A separate expression used in the search provisions, including in relation to identifying places where relevant materials may be kept. Its statutory context must be examined rather than treating it as interchangeable with reason to believe.

Search and seizure: Action under Section 247, subject to the authorisation, conditions, powers and safeguards set out there.

Requisition: Under Section 248, the authorised requirement that another officer or authority holding specified assets or records under another law deliver them to the requisitioning officer, where the statutory conditions are met.

Appellate Tribunal: The appellate forum referred to in the Act. Section 249 expressly includes it within the non-disclosure restriction.

How do Sections 247, 248 and 249 work together?

Section 247: Sets out powers and procedures for search and seizure.
Section 248: Deals with requisition of specified assets, books, documents and computer systems already in another authority's custody.
Section 249: Restricts disclosure of the recorded reasons specified in those two provisions.
Section 250: Governs application of seized or requisitioned assets and is a separate subsequent issue.

Practical implications for taxpayers

Example 1: Request for the recorded search reasons

After an authorised search, a taxpayer asks the department to furnish the internal recorded reasons to believe. Section 249 restricts disclosure of those recorded reasons. Whether any other document may be obtained must be considered under the applicable provisions separately.

Example 2: Requisition from another authority

Records are held by another authority under a different law and the income-tax department initiates requisition proceedings under Section 248. Section 249 applies to the recorded reasons covered by that provision.

Example 3: A dispute about legal compliance

A taxpayer questions whether statutory requirements for a search were satisfied. Section 249 addresses disclosure of recorded reasons; it should not be read as automatically resolving every question about legality, procedure or available judicial remedies. Such questions require consideration of the full statutory scheme and applicable judicial decisions.

Practical point: Preserve the search authorisation and other documents actually served, inventories, seizure records, relevant communications and timelines. Seek case-specific legal advice when challenging a search or requisition action.

Frequently asked questions

Can a taxpayer demand the recorded reasons for an income-tax search?

Section 249 expressly prohibits disclosure of the recorded reason to believe or reason to suspect referred to in Sections 247 and 248.

Does Section 249 apply to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal?

Yes. The statutory text expressly refers to the Appellate Tribunal.

Does Section 249 itself grant search powers?

No. Search and seizure powers arise under Section 247, while requisition powers arise under Section 248.

Are all search-related documents automatically confidential under Section 249?

No such blanket conclusion follows from its wording. The express prohibition concerns the recorded reasons specified in the section. Other records and rights must be considered under the relevant law.

Can a taxpayer challenge a search merely because the recorded reasons were not furnished?

Non-disclosure under Section 249 is expressly contemplated by the Act. The merits of any challenge depend on the applicable statutory requirements, the facts and judicial precedent; non-disclosure alone should not be treated as conclusive proof of illegality.

Official statutory source

Read the official Income-tax Act, 2025, as amended by the Finance Act, 2026, particularly Sections 247 to 250. This source link is provided in the article body, not as a navigation-menu item.

Updated: 11 November 2026. This article provides general legal information, not advice on any particular proceeding.