Home / Income Tax Act 2025 / Section 243

Section 243 Income Tax Act 2025: Can an Income Tax Case Be Transferred to Another Assessing Officer?

Section 243 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 empowers specified income-tax authorities to transfer cases between Assessing Officers, while setting out the rules for approval, recorded reasons and an opportunity of hearing.

Legal position: Section 243 falls in Chapter XIV (Tax Administration) and applies under the Income-tax Act, 2025, effective from 1 April 2026. The provision broadly corresponds to Section 127 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The discussion below is explanatory; the enacted text and applicable notifications govern.

What does Section 243 provide?

Section 243 regulates administrative transfer of income-tax cases. A transfer can occur between Assessing Officers reporting to the same specified income-tax authority or, subject to additional requirements, between officers under different specified authorities. It also addresses hearings, reasons, transfers within the same city and the continuation of proceedings after transfer.

Section 243 explained subsection by subsection

Section 243(1): Transfer between subordinate Assessing Officers

A specified income-tax authority may transfer a case from one or more Assessing Officers subordinate to that authority to another Assessing Officer or Officers also subordinate to that authority. This power applies whether or not the officers have concurrent jurisdiction.

Section 243(2): Transfer where different authorities control the officers

Where the transferring and receiving Assessing Officers are not subordinate to the same specified income-tax authority, the procedure depends on whether the concerned specified authorities agree:

  • Agreement: The specified authority from whose jurisdiction the case is transferred may pass the transfer order.
  • Disagreement: The Board, or a specified income-tax authority notified by the Board for this purpose, may pass the transfer order.

Section 243(3): Opportunity of hearing and recorded reasons

For transfers under subsections (1) and (2), the specified authority may pass an order after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard, wherever it is possible to do so, and after recording reasons for the transfer. These safeguards should be read with the express exception in subsection (4).

Section 243(4): Exception for transfers within the same city, locality or place

An opportunity of being heard is not required under subsections (1), (2) or (3) where the offices of all the transferring and receiving Assessing Officers are situated in the same city, locality or place. The exception concerns the hearing requirement; it does not eliminate the need for a lawful transfer order by the competent authority.

Section 243(5): Transfer at any stage and existing notices

A case may be transferred at any stage of the proceedings. Notices already issued by the transferring Assessing Officer or Officers need not be issued again solely because the case has been transferred. A taxpayer should therefore continue to monitor outstanding notices and deadlines.

Section 243(6): Meaning of a case

For Sections 241 and 243, a case in relation to a person named in an order or direction includes proceedings under the Act for any year that are pending, were completed on or before the date of the order or direction, or may commence after that date. The scope is therefore not necessarily limited to one pending assessment.

Section 243(7): Specified income-tax authority

For Sections 241, 242 and 243, specified income-tax authority means the Principal Director General, Director General, Principal Chief Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Commissioner or Commissioner.

Relevant statutory definitions and terms

Case: The inclusive meaning in Section 243(6) covers pending, completed and future proceedings under the Act in respect of any year, for the person named in the relevant order or direction.
Specified income-tax authority: The authorities expressly listed in Section 243(7), applicable also to Sections 241 and 242.
Assessing Officer: An income-tax authority exercising assessment-related powers under the Act within the jurisdiction assigned under the applicable statutory framework.
Concurrent jurisdiction: A situation in which more than one Assessing Officer may exercise jurisdiction in accordance with applicable directions or orders; Section 243 expressly permits transfers involving such officers.
Board: The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), referred to in the Act as the Board.

Can a taxpayer object to the transfer?

Where Section 243(3) applies, an assessee should ordinarily have a reasonable opportunity to explain objections before the order is passed, wherever possible. Relevant objections may concern practical hardship, the proposed location, the stated basis for transfer or compliance with the statutory procedure. Reasons for the transfer must be recorded.

The same-city, locality or place exception in Section 243(4) removes the statutory requirement of an opportunity of hearing for the transfers it covers. It should not be confused with a blanket exemption from all other legal requirements.

Practical point: Keep a copy of the proposed transfer communication, any objections submitted, the final order and all pending assessment notices. A transfer does not automatically cancel notices or restart statutory response periods.

Practical examples of Section 243

Example 1: Transfer between two offices in the same city

A case moves from one Assessing Officer to another whose office is in the same city. If Section 243(4) applies, the statute does not require a prior opportunity of hearing solely for that transfer.

Example 2: Transfer between different administrative jurisdictions

A case is proposed to move between Assessing Officers reporting to different specified income-tax authorities. If the concerned authorities agree, the transferring authority may issue the order under Section 243(2)(a); if they disagree, Section 243(2)(b) governs.

Example 3: Transfer during an ongoing assessment

An assessment notice has already been issued when the case is transferred. Under Section 243(5), the notice need not be reissued merely because another Assessing Officer takes over the case.

Frequently asked questions

Who can transfer an income-tax case under Section 243?

A specified income-tax authority may transfer cases in the circumstances provided in Section 243(1) and (2). Where the relevant authorities disagree, the Board or a notified specified authority may pass the order.

Is a hearing compulsory before every transfer?

No. Section 243(3) provides for a reasonable opportunity of hearing wherever possible, while Section 243(4) expressly removes that requirement for qualifying transfers within the same city, locality or place.

Must reasons for transfer be recorded?

Section 243(3) requires reasons to be recorded for transfer orders under subsections (1) and (2).

Can a case be transferred after proceedings have started?

Yes. Section 243(5) permits transfer at any stage of the proceedings.

Are previous notices invalid after transfer?

No. Section 243(5) states that notices already issued need not be reissued merely because the case is transferred.

What was the corresponding provision under the Income-tax Act, 1961?

Section 127 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 addressed the power to transfer cases. The exact statutory language and applicable law should be checked for the relevant period.

Official statutory sources and related provisions

For the enacted provision and related jurisdictional rules, consult the official resources below.

Official Section 243Income-tax Act 2025 official PDFIncome Tax e-Filing Portal

Last reviewed: 11 November 2026. This article provides general legal information and is not a substitute for advice on the facts of a particular case.