Section 6 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: Complaint Against Presiding Officers of Subordinate Courts
Section 6 protects a person from being held guilty of contempt merely for making, in good faith, a statement concerning the presiding officer of a subordinate court to another subordinate court or to the High Court to which that court is subordinate.
What Section 6 provides
A person shall not be guilty of contempt of court in respect of any statement made by him in good faith concerning the presiding officer of any subordinate court to-
(a) any other subordinate court, or
(b) the High Court, to which it is subordinate.
Explanation: In this section, "subordinate court" means any court subordinate to a High Court.
Meaning and scope of Section 6
The provision creates a specific statutory protection for a good-faith complaint or statement about the conduct of the presiding officer of a subordinate court when the statement is made to a judicial forum identified by Section 6. The protection is therefore tied both to the requirement of good faith and to the forum to which the statement is made.
1. Statement must concern a presiding officer
The statement must concern the presiding officer of a court subordinate to a High Court. Section 6 itself explains that "subordinate court" means a court subordinate to a High Court.
2. Good faith is essential
The statutory protection expressly applies to a statement made "in good faith." Accordingly, Section 6 should not be read as a general licence for reckless, malicious or unrelated allegations. Whether the statutory protection applies depends on the facts and circumstances of the particular statement and complaint.
3. Complaint must be made to a specified court
Section 6 identifies the permissible recipients as another subordinate court or the High Court to which the court concerned is subordinate. The provision is directed to complaints made through these judicial channels.
Relationship with the definition of contempt
Section 2 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 defines "contempt of court" and distinguishes civil contempt from criminal contempt. Section 6 operates as one of the Act's express protections by providing that a qualifying good-faith statement concerning a subordinate-court presiding officer does not make the person guilty of contempt.
Related protections under the Contempt of Courts Act
The Act also contains specific provisions concerning fair and accurate reports of judicial proceedings under Section 4 and fair criticism of judicial acts under Section 5. These provisions have distinct statutory requirements and should be read according to their own terms.
Official text
For the current official Central Act text, refer to India Code - Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
This article is a general explanation of Section 6 and is not a substitute for legal advice in a particular case.