Section 48AA of the Advocates Act, 1961: Review by the Bar Council of India
Section 48AA of the Advocates Act, 1961 gives the Bar Council of India and its committees, other than its disciplinary committee, a limited statutory power to review orders passed by them under the Act. The review may be initiated on their own motion or otherwise and is subject to a sixty-day period.
Text of Section 48AA - Review
Section 48AA: The Bar Council of India or any of its committees, other than its disciplinary committee, may of its own motion or otherwise review any order, within sixty days of the date of that order, passed by it under this Act.
Meaning and scope of Section 48AA
Section 48AA is a statutory review provision. It enables the Bar Council of India, or one of its committees other than the disciplinary committee, to reconsider an order that it has itself passed under the Advocates Act, 1961. The power is not a general appellate power over orders passed by other authorities.
The section expressly excludes the disciplinary committee of the Bar Council of India. Review of disciplinary committee orders is separately governed by Section 44 of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Who can exercise the power of review?
- The Bar Council of India itself may exercise the power.
- A committee of the Bar Council of India may exercise it if the committee passed the order concerned.
- The disciplinary committee is expressly excluded from Section 48AA.
- The review may be initiated suo motu, meaning on the authority's own motion, or otherwise.
What orders can be reviewed?
The section applies to an order passed under the Advocates Act, 1961 by the Bar Council of India or the relevant committee exercising the review power. The wording therefore ties the review jurisdiction to the authority's own order under the Act.
Sixty-day limitation period
Section 48AA states that review may be undertaken within sixty days of the date of the order. The sixty-day requirement is an express statutory limitation built into the provision.
Supreme Court interpretation: D. Saibaba v. Bar Council of India
In D. Saibaba v. Bar Council of India, the Supreme Court considered when the sixty-day period should begin where the affected person had not received the order immediately. The Court treated communication or knowledge of the order as legally relevant when construing the expression "the date of that order" for the purpose of seeking review.
Section 48AA and Section 44: important distinction
Related provisions
Review is different from revision and appeal
A review under Section 48AA is a reconsideration by the Bar Council of India or the relevant non-disciplinary committee of its own order. Revision under Section 48A concerns certain proceedings disposed of by a State Bar Council or its committee. Appeals from disciplinary decisions are governed by separate provisions, including Sections 37 and 38.
Official legal source
The current central text of the Advocates Act, 1961 is available through the Government of India's India Code portal. The Act, applicable Bar Council of India Rules and current judicial decisions should be checked together where limitation, review jurisdiction or the nature of the order is disputed.