Section 218 IPC: Public Servant Framing Incorrect Record or Writing

Section 218 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 punished a public servant who, while officially charged with preparing a record or other writing, knowingly framed it incorrectly with the intention or knowledge specified by the section.

Pre-BNS legal position: This article explains Section 218 IPC under the law applicable before the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 came into force on 1 July 2024. It is intended as a reference to the IPC-era provision and matters governed by the earlier law.

Section 218 IPC - statutory provision

Whoever, being a public servant, and being as such public servant, charged with the preparation of any record or other writing, frames that record or writing in a manner which he knows to be incorrect, with intent to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause, loss or injury to the public or to any person, or with intent thereby to save, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby save, any person from legal punishment, or with intent to save, or knowing that he is likely thereby to save, any property from forfeiture or other charge to which it is liable by law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

Meaning and scope of Section 218 IPC

The provision applied to a public servant who was officially responsible for preparing a record or other writing. The record or writing had to be framed in a manner that the public servant knew to be incorrect. The section therefore contained both an official-duty requirement and an express knowledge requirement.

The incorrect record or writing also had to be connected with at least one of the consequences specified in the section: causing loss or injury to the public or any person, saving a person from legal punishment, or saving property from forfeiture or another charge imposed by law.

Essential ingredients of Section 218 IPC

Punishment and classification under Section 218 IPC

Legal pointPre-BNS position
PunishmentImprisonment of either description up to 3 years, or fine, or both
Cognizable or non-cognizableCognizable
BailBailable
Court competent to tryMagistrate of the first class

Knowledge that the record is incorrect

The wording of Section 218 required the public servant to know that the record or writing was incorrect. Accordingly, the statutory formulation was directed at knowing falsification or incorrect framing of an official record or writing coupled with the required intention or knowledge concerning its consequence.

Loss or injury to the public or a person

Unlike a provision limited only to shielding an offender, Section 218 also expressly covered an incorrect official record framed with intent to cause, or knowledge of the likelihood of causing, loss or injury to the public or to any person.

Saving a person from legal punishment

The section further applied where the incorrect record or writing was framed with the intention of saving a person from legal punishment, or with knowledge that it was likely to have that effect.

Saving property from forfeiture or other charge

The property limb of Section 218 covered an intention to save, or knowledge of the likelihood of saving, property from forfeiture or another charge to which the property was liable by law.

Section 217 and Section 218 IPC

Section 217 IPC concerned a public servant knowingly disobeying a direction of law with the specified intention or knowledge. Section 218 dealt more specifically with a public servant charged with preparing a record or writing who knowingly framed it incorrectly for one of the purposes or consequences stated in the provision.

Related IPC provisions

For connected provisions concerning public servants and interference with legal punishment, see Section 217 IPC, Section 219 IPC and Section 220 IPC.

This page describes the Indian Penal Code position before implementation of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The law applicable to a particular matter depends on the relevant facts and date of the alleged conduct.