AAP Tax Law

IPC Section 491: Criminal Breach of Contract to Attend on a Helpless Person

Section 491 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was the operative provision in Chapter XIX, titled "Of the Criminal Breach of Contracts of Service." It punished a person who, despite being bound by a lawful contract to attend on or supply the wants of a helpless person, voluntarily failed to perform that obligation.

Pre-BNS legal position: This article explains Section 491 IPC as it stood immediately before the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 came into force on 1 July 2024. For an individual matter, the date of the alleged offence and applicable saving or transition provisions should be examined.

What did Section 491 IPC provide?

Section 491 applied where a person was bound by a lawful contract to attend on, or supply the wants of, another person who was helpless or incapable of providing for his or her own safety or wants because of youth, unsoundness of mind, disease or bodily weakness, and the person bound by the contract voluntarily omitted to perform that obligation.

The section therefore did not criminalize every breach of a contract of service. Its focus was the voluntary failure to perform a lawful contractual duty owed to a person falling within the specified category of helplessness.

Essential ingredients of an offence under Section 491 IPC

1. Lawful contractThere must be a contract that lawfully binds the accused to attend on the person or supply that person's wants.
2. Duty to attend or supply wantsThe contractual obligation must concern attending on the protected person or supplying his or her needs.
3. HelplessnessThe protected person must be helpless or incapable of providing for personal safety or wants for one of the reasons stated in Section 491.
4. Voluntary omissionThe accused must voluntarily omit to perform the contractual obligation. The statutory wording therefore requires more than the mere existence of an unperformed obligation.

Who was protected as a helpless person?

Section 491 identified four circumstances that could make a person helpless or incapable of providing for his or her own safety or wants:

  • Youth - where age leaves the person unable to provide for personal safety or needs.
  • Unsoundness of mind - where the person's mental condition results in the statutory incapacity.
  • Disease - where illness makes the person helpless or incapable of meeting personal safety or needs.
  • Bodily weakness - where physical weakness produces the required helplessness or incapacity.

The existence of one of these circumstances alone is not the whole offence. The prosecution must connect the protected person's condition with the lawful contractual duty and the accused person's voluntary omission.

Section 491 IPC: punishment, cognizability, bail and trial court

ProvisionOffencePunishmentCognizableBailTriable by
Section 491 IPC Being bound by a lawful contract to attend on or supply the wants of a helpless person and voluntarily omitting to do so Imprisonment of either description up to 3 months, or fine up to Rs. 200, or both Non-cognizable Bailable Any Magistrate

The procedural classification above reflects the central First Schedule to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applicable immediately before 1 July 2024. Any relevant State amendment should be checked separately.

Chapter XIX and repealed Sections 490 and 492

Chapter XIX was headed "Of the Criminal Breach of Contracts of Service." By the period immediately before the BNS came into force, Section 491 was its operative penal provision.

Section 490, which had dealt with breach of contract of service during a voyage or journey, and Section 492, which had dealt with breach of contract to serve at a distant place to which a servant was conveyed at the master's expense, had been repealed by the Workmen's Breach of Contract (Repealing) Act, 1925. They should therefore not be presented as operative IPC offences for the pre-BNS 2024 position.

When could a contractual omission attract Section 491?

A simple employment or service dispute was not, merely because it involved non-performance, automatically an offence under Section 491. The statutory provision required the specific combination of a lawful contractual obligation to attend on or supply the wants of a protected helpless person and a voluntary omission to discharge that obligation.

Accordingly, the terms and lawfulness of the contract, the condition of the person receiving care or support, the nature of the contractual duty and whether the omission was voluntary were all material to determining whether the statutory ingredients were present.

Example for understanding Section 491

If a person is lawfully engaged under a contract to attend on an individual who, because of serious disease or bodily weakness, cannot provide for his or her own safety or basic wants, and the contracted person voluntarily abandons that contractual duty in circumstances satisfying Section 491, the provision may be attracted. Whether an offence is actually established depends on proof of every statutory ingredient and the facts of the particular case.

Legal reference: This page is a general explanation of the central IPC and CrPC position immediately before 1 July 2024. The complete statutory text, applicable amendments and binding judicial decisions should be considered for a particular proceeding.