Section 356 BNS: Defamation

Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 defines criminal defamation, explains when an imputation harms reputation, provides ten statutory exceptions, and separately punishes defamation, printing or engraving defamatory matter, and selling printed or engraved defamatory material with the required knowledge.

Current legal position: The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 came into force on 1 July 2024, except section 106(2). Section 356 is therefore an operative criminal law provision.

What is defamation under Section 356 BNS?

Defamation under Section 356(1) involves making or publishing an imputation concerning a person by spoken or written words, signs or visible representations, with intent to harm that person's reputation, or with knowledge or reason to believe that the imputation will harm reputation, unless the case falls within one of the statutory exceptions.

The provision therefore requires more than mere criticism or disagreement. The nature of the imputation, publication, the required mental element, harm to reputation in the estimation of others, and the statutory exceptions are all relevant.

Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

356. (1) Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes in any manner, any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter excepted, to defame that person.

Explanation 1. It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives.

Explanation 2. It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such.

Explanation 3. An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically, may amount to defamation.

Explanation 4. No imputation is said to harm a person's reputation, unless that imputation directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person, or lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or of his calling, or lowers the credit of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of that person is in a loathsome state, or in a state generally considered as disgraceful.

Illustrations.

(a) A says- "Z is an honest man; he never stole B's watch"; intending to cause it to be believed that Z did steal B's watch. This is defamation, unless it falls within one of the exceptions.

(b) A is asked who stole B's watch. A points to Z, intending to cause it to be believed that Z stole B's watch. This is defamation, unless it falls within one of the exceptions.

(c) A draws a picture of Z running away with B's watch, intending it to be believed that Z stole B's watch. This is defamation, unless it falls within one of the exceptions.

Exception 1. It is not defamation to impute anything which is true concerning any person, if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or published. Whether or not it is for the public good is a question of fact.

Exception 2. It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of a public servant in the discharge of his public functions, or respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.

Exception 3. It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of any person touching any public question, and respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.

Illustration. It is not defamation in A to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting Z's conduct in petitioning Government on a public question, in signing a requisition for a meeting on a public question, in presiding or attending at such meeting, in forming or joining any society which invites the public support, in voting or canvassing for a particular candidate for any situation in the efficient discharge of the duties of which the public is interested.

Exception 4. It is not defamation to publish substantially true report of the proceedings of a Court, or of the result of any such proceedings.

Explanation. A Magistrate or other officer holding an inquiry in open Court preliminary to a trial in a Court, is a Court within the meaning of the above section.

Exception 5. It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the merits of any case, civil or criminal, which has been decided by a Court, or respecting the conduct of any person as a party, witness or agent, in any such case, or respecting the character of such person, as far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.

Illustrations.

(a) A says-"I think Z's evidence on that trial is so contradictory that he must be stupid or dishonest". A is within this exception if he says this in good faith, in as much as the opinion which he expresses respects Z's character as it appears in Z's conduct as a witness, and no further.

(b) But if A says-"I do not believe what Z asserted at that trial because I know him to be a man without veracity"; A is not within this exception, in as much as the opinion which expresses of Z's character, is an opinion not founded on Z's conduct as a witness.

Exception 6. It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion respecting the merits of any performance which its author has submitted to the judgment of the public, or respecting the character of the author so far as his character appears in such performance, and no further.

Explanation. A performance may be submitted to the judgment of the public expressly or by acts on the part of the author which imply such submission to the judgment of the public.

Illustrations.

(a) A person who publishes a book, submits that book to the judgment of the public.

(b) A person who makes a speech in public, submits that speech to the judgment of the public.

(c) An actor or singer who appears on a public stage, submits his acting or singing to the judgment of the public.

(d) A says of a book published by Z-"Z's book is foolish; Z must be a weak man. Z's book is indecent; Z must be a man of impure mind". A is within the exception, if he says this in good faith, in as much as the opinion which he expresses of Z respects Z's character only so far as it appears in Z's book, and no further.

(e) But if A says "I am not surprised that Z's book is foolish and indecent, for he is a weak man and a libertine". A is not within this exception, in as much as the opinion which he expresses of Z's character is an opinion not founded on Z's book.

Exception 7. It is not defamation in a person having over another any authority, either conferred by law or arising out of a lawful contract made with that other, to pass in good faith any censure on the conduct of that other in matters to which such lawful authority relates.

Illustration. A Judge censuring in good faith the conduct of a witness, or of an officer of the Court; a head of a department censuring in good faith those who are under his orders, a parent censuring in good faith a child in the presence of other children; a school master, whose authority is derived from a parent, censuring in good faith a pupil in the presence of other pupils; a master censuring a servant in good faith for remissness in service; a banker censuring in good faith the cashier of his bank for the conduct of such cashier as such cashier are within this exception.

Exception 8. It is not defamation to prefer in good faith an accusation against any person to any of those who have lawful authority over that person with respect to the subject-matter of accusation.

Illustration. If A in good faith accuses Z before a Magistrate; if A in good faith complains of the conduct of Z, a servant, to Z's master; if A in good faith complains of the conduct of Z, a child, to Z's father, A is within this exception.

Exception 9. It is not defamation to make an imputation on the character of another provided that the imputation be made in good faith for the protection of the interests of the person making it, or of any other person, or for the public good.

Illustrations.

(a) A, a shopkeeper, says to B, who manages his business-"Sell nothing to Z unless he pays you ready money, for I have no opinion of his honesty". A is within the exception, if he has made this imputation on Z in good faith for the protection of his own interests.

(b) A, a Magistrate, in making a report to his own superior officer, casts an imputation on the character of Z. Here, if the imputation is made in good faith, and for the public good, A is within the exception.

Exception 10. It is not defamation to convey a caution, in good faith, to one person against another, provided that such caution be intended for the good of the person to whom it is conveyed, or of some person in whom that person is interested, or for the public good.

(2) Whoever defames another shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both, or with community service.

(3) Whoever prints or engraves any matter, knowing or having good reason to believe that such matter is defamatory of any person, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

(4) Whoever sells or offers for sale any printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter, knowing that it contains such matter, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Four explanations under Section 356

  • Deceased person: an imputation may amount to defamation if it would have harmed the deceased person's reputation if living and is intended to hurt the feelings of family or near relatives.
  • Companies and groups: an imputation concerning a company, association or collection of persons may amount to defamation.
  • Indirect or ironic imputations: an alternative or ironic form may still amount to defamation.
  • Reputational harm: the imputation must lower the person's character, credit or standing in the estimation of others in one of the ways specified in Explanation 4.

Ten statutory exceptions to defamation

Section 356 contains ten exceptions. They are not blanket permissions; the conditions stated in each exception must be satisfied.

Exception 1 - Truth for public good

A true imputation is protected where it is for the public good that it should be made or published. Public good is a question of fact.

Exception 2 - Public servant's conduct

Good-faith opinion on a public servant's conduct in discharge of public functions, and character only so far as it appears in that conduct.

Exception 3 - Conduct touching a public question

Good-faith opinion on conduct relating to a public question, with character considered only so far as it appears in that conduct.

Exception 4 - Reports of court proceedings

Publication of a substantially true report of court proceedings or their result.

Exception 5 - Merits of decided cases

Good-faith opinion on the merits of a decided civil or criminal case and on the conduct of parties, witnesses or agents within the statutory limits.

Exception 6 - Merits of public performances

Good-faith opinion on the merits of a performance submitted to public judgment and the author's character only so far as it appears in that performance.

Exception 7 - Censure by lawful authority

Good-faith censure by a person who has lawful or contractual authority over another, concerning matters to which that authority relates.

Exception 8 - Accusation to lawful authority

A good-faith accusation made to a person having lawful authority over the person complained against in relation to the subject matter.

Exception 9 - Protection of interests or public good

An imputation made in good faith for protection of the maker's interests, another person's interests, or for public good.

Exception 10 - Good-faith caution

A caution conveyed in good faith for the good of the recipient, a person in whom the recipient is interested, or for public good.

Essential ingredients of criminal defamation

  • There must be an imputation concerning a person, company, association or collection of persons falling within the statutory language.
  • The imputation must be made or published by words, signs or visible representations.
  • The accused must intend to harm reputation, or know or have reason to believe that the imputation will harm reputation.
  • Reputational harm must satisfy the statutory meaning in Explanation 4.
  • The case must not fall within one of the ten statutory exceptions.

Punishment under Section 356 BNS

ProvisionConductPunishment
Section 356(2)Defaming another personSimple imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both, or community service
Section 356(3)Printing or engraving defamatory matter with the required knowledge or reason to believeSimple imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both
Section 356(4)Selling or offering for sale printed or engraved defamatory matter with knowledgeSimple imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both

BNSS classification and trial court

CategoryCognizabilityBailTrial court
Ordinary defamation under Section 356(2)Non-cognizableBailableMagistrate of the first class
Section 356(3) or 356(4), ordinary caseNon-cognizableBailableMagistrate of the first class
Specified defamation concerning the President, Vice-President, Governor, Administrator or Minister in respect of public functions, when instituted upon a Public Prosecutor's complaintNon-cognizableBailableCourt of Session

The precise procedural route therefore depends on the nature of the alleged defamation and the statutory mode by which proceedings are instituted.

Compounding of defamation under BNSS

The BNSS permits compounding by the person defamed for ordinary defamation under Section 356(2), subject to the statutory exclusion for the specified public-office cases referred to in the compounding table. The printing or engraving offence under Section 356(3), and the sale offence under Section 356(4), are also listed as compoundable by the person defamed.

Legal information note: Defamation is highly fact-sensitive. The exact words or representation, publication, context, audience, intent or knowledge, reputational effect, truth, public good, good faith and the applicable statutory exception may all be material.