Section 22 of Evidence Act "When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant"
Oral admissions as to the contents of a documents are not relevant, unless and until the party proposing to prove them shows that he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents of such document under the rules herein after contained, or unless the geniuses of a document produced is in question.
Section 22A of Evidence Act "When oral admission as to
contents of electronic records are relevant"
Oral admissions as to the contents of electronic records are
not relevant, unless the genuineness of the electronic
record produced is in question.
Section 23 of Evidence Act "Admission in civil cases relevant"
In civil cases no admission is relevant, if it is made either upon an express condition that evidence of it is not to be given, or under circumstances from which the Court can infer that the parties agreed together that evidence of it should both be given.
Explanation Nothing in this section shall be taken to
exempt any barrister, pleader attorney or vakil from giving
evidence of any matter of which he may be compelled to give
evidence under section 126.