Sections 139, 140 and 141 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Cross-examination of a person called to produce a document, witnesses to character, and leading questions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Section 139 - Cross-examination of person called to produce a document
Meaning: Section 139 distinguished between merely producing a document in response to a summons and actually giving evidence as a witness. Production of the document alone did not place the person in the witness box for the purpose of cross-examination.
If a party wanted to question that person as a witness, the person had to be called as a witness in accordance with law. Only then would cross-examination arise. The provision therefore prevented the act of document production, by itself, from being treated as testimonial evidence given by the producer.
Section 140 - Witnesses to character
Meaning: A character witness was not insulated from the ordinary testing of evidence. Section 140 expressly permitted cross-examination and re-examination of a witness who gave character evidence.
Cross-examination could test the basis, reliability and weight of the character testimony, subject to the other provisions of the Evidence Act governing permissible questions. Re-examination could then be used, within its lawful scope, to explain matters arising from cross-examination.
Section 141 - Leading questions
Meaning: The essential feature of a leading question is suggestion. The wording points the witness toward the answer desired or expected by the examiner instead of simply asking the witness to state the fact from independent recollection.
For example, a question framed as an assertion followed by a request for agreement may be leading where it suggests the material answer. Whether a particular question is leading depends on its substance and context, not merely on whether it can be answered with "yes" or "no".
Sections 142 and 143 - When leading questions could be asked
Section 141 supplied the definition, but the practical rule was completed by Sections 142 and 143 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
| Stage of examination | Pre-BSA rule |
|---|---|
| Examination-in-chief | If the adverse party objected, leading questions could not ordinarily be asked without the Court's permission. |
| Re-examination | The same restriction applied, subject to permission of the Court. |
| Introductory, undisputed or sufficiently proved matters | The Court was to permit leading questions on matters falling within these categories. |
| Cross-examination | Leading questions could be asked. |
This distinction reflected the different purposes of examination-in-chief and cross-examination. In chief examination, the witness ordinarily gives the witness's own account; in cross-examination, suggestive questioning is an accepted means of testing the evidence and obtaining admissions, subject to the Court's control and the other rules of evidence.
Practical summary of Sections 139, 140 and 141
| Section | Subject | Core rule |
|---|---|---|
| 139 | Person called to produce a document | Mere production of a document does not make the producer a witness or expose the person to cross-examination unless called as a witness. |
| 140 | Witnesses to character | A character witness may be cross-examined and re-examined. |
| 141 | Leading questions | A question is leading when it suggests the answer the examiner wishes or expects to receive. |