CrPC Sections 467 to 473: Limitation for Taking Cognizance of Certain Offences

Chapter XXXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 dealt with the time limits within which a criminal court could take cognizance of specified offences. This article explains Sections 467 to 473 as they applied under the CrPC framework before the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 came into force.

Pre-BNSS law: The CrPC provisions discussed below are retained for understanding proceedings governed by the earlier Code and its savings. BNSS came into force on 1 July 2024. Under BNSS, the corresponding provisions are Sections 513 to 519.

What is the period of limitation under CrPC?

Section 467 defines the expression "period of limitation" for Chapter XXXVI as the period specified in Section 468 for taking cognizance of an offence. In simple terms, the Chapter fixes a statutory time limit for taking cognizance of certain less serious offences, subject to the rules on commencement, exclusion, continuing offences and extension contained in the following sections.

Punishment for the offenceLimitation under Section 468
Fine onlySix months
Imprisonment not exceeding one yearOne year
Imprisonment exceeding one year but not exceeding three yearsThree years

Section 467 CrPC - Definition of period of limitation

For Chapter XXXVI, "period of limitation" means the period specified in Section 468 for taking cognizance of an offence. The definition therefore links the entire limitation scheme to the periods prescribed by Section 468.

Section 468 CrPC - Bar to taking cognizance after limitation

Subject to other provisions of the Code, a court cannot take cognizance of an offence falling within Section 468(2) after the applicable limitation period has expired. The periods are six months for an offence punishable with fine only, one year where imprisonment does not exceed one year, and three years where imprisonment exceeds one year but does not exceed three years.

Where offences may be tried together, Section 468(3) determines limitation by reference to the offence carrying the more severe, or most severe, punishment.

Section 469 CrPC - When limitation begins

The limitation period ordinarily starts on the date of the offence. If commission of the offence was not known to the aggrieved person or any police officer, it starts on the first day the offence becomes known to either of them, whichever is earlier. If the offender was unknown, it starts on the first day the offender's identity becomes known to the aggrieved person or investigating police officer, whichever is earlier. The first day from which the period is computed is excluded.

Section 470 CrPC - Exclusion of time in certain cases

Section 470 permits specified periods to be left out when calculating limitation. These include time spent diligently and in good faith prosecuting another proceeding based on the same facts before a court unable to entertain it because of jurisdictional defect or a similar cause; the period during which prosecution is stayed by injunction or order; and, where required by law, the period of notice or the time required for obtaining governmental or other consent or sanction.

The provision also excludes the time during which the offender was absent from India or a territory outside India under Central Government administration, or avoided arrest by absconding or concealing himself.

Section 471 CrPC - Court closed on the last day

If limitation expires on a day when the court is closed, Section 471 permits cognizance on the day the court reopens. This prevents expiry merely because the court was unavailable on the last permissible day.

Section 472 CrPC - Continuing offence

For a continuing offence, a fresh period of limitation begins to run at every moment during which the offence continues. Whether an offence is continuing depends on the nature of the statutory duty and the particular offence involved.

Section 473 CrPC - Extension of limitation

Section 473 operates notwithstanding the preceding provisions of Chapter XXXVI. A court may take cognizance after expiry of limitation where, on the facts and circumstances, it is satisfied that the delay has been properly explained or that taking cognizance is necessary in the interests of justice.

State amendment - Andhra Pradesh and Telangana

The existing page records the Andhra Pradesh amendment made by Andhra Pradesh Act 17 of 1982, under which Chapter XXXVI does not apply to specified scheduled offences and offences triable with them. The applicability and present territorial effect of a State amendment should be checked against the governing State law and the facts of the proceeding.

Corresponding provisions under BNSS

For present-day reference, CrPC Sections 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472 and 473 broadly correspond to BNSS Sections 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518 and 519 respectively. BNSS Section 514 also contains an Explanation concerning the relevant date for computing limitation. This article, however, is intentionally focused on the CrPC position before implementation of BNSS.

Legal information on this page is general in nature. The applicable procedural law, saving provisions, special statutes and State amendments should be examined for the particular case.